
Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey,’ which I saw with my husband over the weekend, has put the poem back in front of a lot of people who, like me, read it years ago and didn’t quite metabolize what it was all about. My twins are nowhere near college applications, but I think about this stuff more than I probably should for someone whose kids are still so young. Still, I know that sometime in ninth or tenth grade, they’ll be handed tattered paperbacks of The Odyssey, and it’ll become one more thing in the pile of assigned reading, group chats, TikToks and podcasts that shapes who they turn into by the time they’re 18. Nobody gives a fourteen-year-old a syllabus and tells them in advance which assignments are going to be impactful. Certain lessons just stick, or they don’t, and a parent mostly finds out what was important to their kid years later.
If your kid is college-bound, here’s the part of the poem that matters: Odysseus doesn’t get far by being the strongest Achaean on the island. He’s often, and a little embarrassingly, not. He guts it out by refusing to give the same performance twice: reading Circe like a baby Ivy admit interview, Cyclops like an email from the co-op and the Phaeacians like a toast he gave at his nephew’s bar mitzvah. He never assumes the version of himself that worked in one place will land in the next.
That’s not a talent every character in the poem possesses. Most of Odysseus’s crew dies because they can’t do this. And it’s a strange thing to have almost forgotten about a story so many of us technically know, because it’s the same skill that separates a strong applicant from one who reads as interchangeable with every other kid from a similar school with similar grades, similar scores and a similarly full activities list.
Promising kids blur together for this reason. What keeps one from disappearing into the pile isn’t the tenth thing listed on the activities section, it’s whether the file in front of an admissions officer reads like it was written by a young person with judgment about which parts of themselves belong where.
That’s not the same thing as reinventing yourself for each school, and I feel it’s worth being direct about the difference, because sometimes I hear parents get this backward. It’s closer to what happens to me when I move through different rooms at the same party, totally myself in each one, but the version that comes out with my college friends isn’t the one that surfaces with my mother-in-law, and nobody sees that as dishonest. A “why us” supplemental essay is really asking which room this is, and which true part of a kid belongs in it.
The Common App’s personal statement runs on a separate logic, on purpose. The seven prompts, announced in February and unchanged from last year, ask a student to write about a defining background or talent, a setback, a belief they questioned, an act of gratitude, a moment of growth, a subject that consumes their attention, or whatever else they want to say if none of those fit. Whichever one a student picks, that single essay travels unedited to every school on the list. Its intent is to generalize.
The supplement is the opposite assignment, and it’s worth looking at what that produces rather than describing it abstractly. Johns Hopkins publishes real examples every year in its “Essays That Worked” archive. One student wrote about where his interest in math started. Another used a fear of public speaking as her way in. A third used salt (I went wild over this) to talk about noticing communities different from her own. None of those would survive as a generic “why any school” essay, because none of them were written to be portable. Each is a specific answer meant for one place, which is the entire test a supplement is running underneath its surface question.
That “test” just got higher stakes. Tulane, the University of Georgia and UNC Chapel Hill have all dropped their supplemental essays for the 2026-27 cycle, and Cornell got rid of its university-wide prompt as well, according to Inside Higher Ed, with Tulane’s dean pointing directly to the flood of AI-written submissions as a factor. That should sound like relief, but I don’t see it that way.
Fewer chances to demonstrate specificity means the ones still standing, and the personal statement underneath all of it, now have to carry weight that used to be spread across two or three essays. For a kid who already does everything well, that’s the entire angle: not whether the application’s impressive, but whether it reads like someone who knew which part of themselves each remaining question was asking for.
Nolan’s movie has its own things to say about The Odyssey, including a late turn that isn’t mine to spoil, and plenty of people walked out of it with an elevated read on the whole story. Whatever you walk away with, or don’t, there’s a separate piece with meaning this fall, and it isn’t the plot. It’s the instinct Nolan rebuilds the epic around: that a person can stay entirely themselves and still know which version of that self a given place is asking to meet.
The mindset is one thing, the Common App itself is a separate obstacle, and it trips up the most introspective kids we work with in ways that have nothing to do with essays or angles. I’m doing a live walkthrough of the Common App on Aug. 4 at 12 p.m. eastern, a few days after the portal opens. I’ll go through each section and focus on the ones that raise the most questions, misconceptions and mistakes we see once kids start filling it out.
.png)
.jpg)

.avif)

.avif)

